[ℚ𝕦𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕤 𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕥 𝕥𝕙𝕖 ℕ𝕠𝕟-𝕕𝕦𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕥𝕪 / ℂ𝕠-𝕖𝕧𝕠𝕝𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 / 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝕤𝕦𝕓𝕛𝕖𝕔𝕥-𝕠𝕓𝕛𝕖𝕔𝕥 -- 𝕗𝕣𝕠𝕞 𝕁𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕃𝕠𝕨]
Don't think that anything that occurs will poison you (negative).
Don't think that anything that occurs will save you (positive).
The answer doesn't lie in the object (objectivism).
The object is an ornament, the object is an enjoyment,
the object is always flowing
and with that 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 is our ordinary conscious 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙩𝙪𝙢𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 [co-evolving].
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝙉𝙤𝙣-𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 / 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 / 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨 [𝙐3𝙎]:
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 / 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 -- 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥, 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 / 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘢 -- 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 / 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯; 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 / 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘤𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥 <==> 𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 [𝘛2], 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 / 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘬𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢; 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴 / 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘴 / 𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 / 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘴 / 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 [𝘜2𝘛]. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 / 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 / 𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 / 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 / 𝘰𝘯𝘦 / 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 / 𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 / 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 '𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴', 𝘯𝘰𝘵 '𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴', 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 -- 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 '𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴' 𝘪𝘴'.)
.
What remains is awareness. Awareness is always there.
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭-𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 / 𝘉𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘴 / 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦 / 𝘉𝘶𝘥𝘥𝘩𝘢-𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 / 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘦-𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 / 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘭-𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 / 𝘚𝘶𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 / 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 / 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘸𝘰 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘴 & 𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢 -- 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴 --.)
.
-- James Low
.
Dzogchen is concerned with non-duality.
That is to say there is no radical tear in the universe;
there are no fundamental distinctions [opposites / dualities ...].
.
.
𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧, 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩.
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝙉𝙤𝙣-𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 / 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 / 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨 [𝙐3𝙎]:
𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴 -- 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 -- 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 / 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯; 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 / 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘤𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥 <==> 𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 [𝘛2], 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 / 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘬𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢; 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴 / 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘴 / 𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 / 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘴 / 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 [𝘜2𝘛]. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 / 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 / 𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 / 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 / 𝘰𝘯𝘦 / 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 / 𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 / 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 '𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴', 𝘯𝘰𝘵 '𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴', 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 -- 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 '𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴' 𝘪𝘴'.)
.
.
.
And neither is 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙂𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚
or [between] the mind, the movement of the mind, and the nature of the mind.
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝙉𝙤𝙣-𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 / 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 / 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙂𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 [𝙐𝙂𝙈].
𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘎𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 / 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯; 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 / 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘤𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥 <==> 𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 [𝘛2], 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 / 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 / 𝘬𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢; 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴 / 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘴 / 𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 / 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘴 / 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 [𝘜2𝘛]. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 / 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 / 𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 / 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 / 𝘰𝘯𝘦 / 𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 / 𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘶𝘴 / 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳; 𝘯𝘰𝘵 '𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴',, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 '𝘯𝘰𝘯-𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴', 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 -- 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 '𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴' 𝘪𝘴'.)
.
These are not separate things because there are no things at all.
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 / 𝘵𝘸𝘰, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘦 ... 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 ... 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 & 𝘥𝘺𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘤: 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘦-𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘴 & 𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 = 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘸𝘰 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘴 & 𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 [𝘜2𝘛].)
.
.
From the very beginning everything is completely pure and empty.
That is simply a way of saying that when you look to find particular essences which are inherent or given or defining of anything, you can't see them, they are not there.
.
-- James Low
.
It is very important to precisely understand what is meant in buddhism by the term '𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣'.
Perhaps a better way of translating it would be '𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙥𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮'.
.
The seeming solidity and reliability of phenomena [T1]
is an illusion since they have no enduring self-substance [T2] ]U2T].
.
Both the grasper (𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩) and the grasped (𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩) (and the grasping / 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣) are [like] illusions. [U3S / U2T-3S]
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝘈𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘴 / 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦, 𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘮𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴, 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘴, 𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘴, 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘴: '𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦.' [𝘜2𝘛].)
.
.
To see emptiness of the 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩
but still to hold on to the substantial reality of the 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩
merely takes us further from liberation.
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 [𝘛2] <==> 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 [𝘛1], 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘥 / 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥 [𝘜3𝘚]. 𝘚𝘰 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 / 𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘢-𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺, 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥-𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺, 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 / 𝘬𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢 / 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴-𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 / 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴-𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺.)
.
-- James Low
.
The answer doesn't lie in the object but we are object fixated because
we live in duality which is 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙡𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩.
.
(𝘪.𝘦. 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 = 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 / 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 / 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘤𝘰-𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 <==> 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴 -- 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥, 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 / 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 / 𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘢 / 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥.)
.
So the subject is always looking for the right kind of object [T1] that will make things ok and it never finds it [T2].
.
- James Low
.
I manifest with.
Withness is my manifestation.
I don't start as me. I start as we. Always.
I am always in communication even if I am on my own.
I am in communication always.
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩.
.
-- James Low
.
See also:
Subject & object are collaborating as equal - 150
https://www.gilehtblog.com/2021/11/subject-object-are-collaborating-as.html
EVERYTHING EXISTING IN RELATIONSHIPS
.
"Not thinking of things in a dualistic fashion means seeing them as existing in relationships, not as existing independently.
.
𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙨 𝙤𝙛 [𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 / 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩 / 𝙞𝙣𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙚𝙭𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜] 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩 (𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣), “𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧” 𝙖𝙣𝙙 “𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙙” [𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣]
(Tib. dzin yul; Skt. grahaya and grahayaka).
.
When we see things dualistically, we think that there is a perceiver here, as a subject, and a perceived object out there, something that is external to the perceiver, something that is “other.” According to Buddhism, the perceiver and the perceived are [inter-]dependent phenomena, as is everything else.
.
𝙎𝙤 𝙞𝙛 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙨 [𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧-]𝙙𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙣𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙖 [𝙏1],
𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙨 𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙞𝙣𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 [𝙏2] [𝙐2𝙏].
.
This is what emptiness means.
From that, we are able to eschew our fixation on things as having some kind of self-sufficient existence.
This, in itself, according to Buddhism, can free or liberate us from the distorted ways of thinking we entangle ourselves in."
.
~ Traleg Kyabgon Rinpoche
.
Pure non-dual observation.
.
CHOKYI NYIMA RINPOCHE
BUDDHA-NATURE
One should first recognize the Buddha-Nature, then train in it, and finally attain stability. In order to recognize the Buddha-Nature, we must identify exactly what is preventing us from realizing it now and what needs to be cleared away - all the passing stains of confusion. Where did these passing stains come from ? The ground itself, the Buddha-Nature, is without impurity or confusion, but the temporary defilements, the stains of confusion, result from not having recognized the state of the ground.
What is fruition ? The immaculate Dharmakaya is the fruition of having purified these stains. Through practice, we unveil a state free from all dualistic phenomena, free from holding on to subject and object, perceiver and perceived. Having totally discarded all the different ways of being mistaken, having rid oneself of the passing stains, we realize Dharmakaya, the ground itself exactly as it is. This is the fruition of purification.
The Innate Beyond Subject And Object ~ Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
.
Phenomena [object] are the radiance of the innate absolute [Ground];
Mind’s nature is the wisdom [subject] of the innate absolute [Ground].
The ultimate teacher – phenomena and mind merged in one taste –
.
(i.e. Realising the inconceivable true nature & dynamic of the Ground:
Union of the Two Truths [U2T], or Union of the three spheres [U2T-3S],
or Union of opposites [U2T-opp], or Union of the Ground and its manifestations [U2T-GM].)
.
Dwells naturally within myself.
Ah ho! What a joy!
.
(i.e. Everything in both samsara & nirvana is spontaneous natural unceasing manifestations of the Ground, inseparable from the Ground [UGM], have the same unique true nature: the Ground / Union of the Two Truths [U2T]. That is why we say that everything is primordially equal, pure, perfect, complete, free, enlightened, the inseparable three kayas, the true Buddha.)
.
Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche
.
Via: Just Dharma Quotes
Conclusion: A subject (innately Buddha / Ground) is non-dualistically non-conceptually directly perceiving / inter-acting with the object (also innately Buddha / Ground).
Everything is Buddha / Ground perceiving / inter-acting with Buddha / Ground.
The subject / mind and object / phenomena are on the same level;
one is not more important / pure / true than the other.
.
Buddha inter-acting with Buddha.
It is either aware of this or not. Nirvana or samsara.
.
